|
50 N. Wacker Dr., Suite 1870
Chicago, IL 60606-1657
Phone: 312-781-1963
Fax: 312-781-1962
The Lawyers:
Robert K. Downs
Barbara A. Downs
Elizabeth A. Teague
Kate E. Milewski
How to Contact Us
This web site is designed for general information only. The
information presented at this web site should not be construed to be
formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel
for advice regarding their individual issues.
|
HOW
MUCH WILL MY CASE COST?
When the initial lawyer/client interview takes
place a lot of ground is covered, but sooner or later the
discussion gets to the issue of cost. We divide the subject into
three parts; hourly rates, retainer, and total fee.
Hourly Rates
Charging by the actual time spent is the normal
means by which representation is provided in the family law area.
Lawyers= hourly rates
range anywhere from $100 to $500 in the extreme. Currently $200 to
$400 will encompass the broadest range of competent attorneys. A
higher hourly rate is not always a guarantee of superior services
any more than lower rates are a bargain. It is said that two good
lawyers on a case will result in lower total fees than if one is
inexperienced or unprofessional. Family Law, generally, is not the
place for the self-styled litigator.
There are attorneys who think that the practice of law is a game,
and there are more than enough clients who engage these attorneys
to be like gladiators on the field. Inevitably, the case is
unfocused and horrendous amounts of time and money are spent on
posturing, frivolous pleadings, and encouragement of disputes. In
the meantime, the parties are not getting to what really divides
them and what they must do to bring an end to the litigation. The
guiding principal should be attorneys who do not just tell their
clients what they want to hear, but are truthful with their
clients, maintain realistic expectations and are realistic about
fees.
Hourly rates are a very minor indicator of the
total fees, which are much more driven by the methodology of the
lawyer, the problems encountered (over which an attorney may have
little control), and the honesty in which they do their billing.
Unlike many other service trades where the bulk of the service is
done in the presence of the patient or client, a great deal of an
attorney's work is done
outside of the clients immediate presence. Clients can only rely
upon the trustworthiness and professionalism of the attorney.
We bill monthly and itemize in tenths of an hour
increments (which will result in a lower overall fee than billing
in quarter hour increments). The billing details the nature of the
work preformed and the date. Thereafter, the client will always
have a ready means to analyze their attorney 's
performance and there is much less likely to be a future fee
dispute.
Retainers
Any experienced attorney in this area knows that
it is just not possible to be an effective representative if you
also become your client's
banker and creditor. Therefore, it is common that there be a
deposit of funds called a retainer into a trust account. The
amount will vary with the nature of the case and will be
determined as a result of the initial interview. Retainers can
range anywhere from $1000 on up with respect to whether there are
serious property litigation, business evaluations and custody
issues. In every instance, however, an attorney should be able to
review why the retainer is set at any particular amount and the
retainer should be refundable, meaning that at the point
representation should cease (regardless of the reason) any
positive balance in the retainer account be refunded to the
client. Finally, it is very common for retainers to be
replenishable, meaning that from time to time during the course of
the case additional deposits may be required.
What's the total bill going to be?
The only honest answer to this is - I
don=t know.
It is our judgment that there is the greatest chance of
misunderstanding and feeling of betrayal when an attorney attempts
to guess the total cost of a case in advance. It simply cannot be
done with any reliability and the moment the amount predicted is
exceeded, a client might well feel that the attorney must not have
known what they were talking about in the beginning because they
misjudged the amount. We never quote what we believe a total fee
will be and basically believe it dishonest to do so. At the same
time we point out that things do not happen over night and early
in the case a client will begin to understand why the costs are
what they are. Decisions are made constantly through effective
communication between the attorney and the client of the various
options available and whether to incur certain costs.
The amount of the fees can become an important
factor which leads to settlement of the case. It is for these
reasons that we regularly tell clients in the initial interview
that they should be very careful, indeed should be wary, of the
attorney who attempts to predict the total fee in the beginning,
likewise one should be wary of an attorney who quotes a flat fee.
In the first instance, a flat fee may well put the attorney in a
position of, in effect, working for nothing at the most critical
stages of the case when their most serious devotion to the case is
required. In the latter instance, an attorney who quotes a flat
fee for what starts out as a major case but falls into place quite
quickly results in both unjust enrichment to the attorney and the
belief by a client that the attorney misrepresented the
seriousness of the case. Obviously we cannot predict the future.
The simplest cases have a way of falling apart and some of the
most complicated and traumatic matters sometimes fall together
very quickly.
We hope that this frank discussion of fees will
assist you in your discussion of fees both with us or any other
attorney. One of the most important things that I have learned in
my career is to be up front about fees. It is potentially an area
of great misunderstanding and hard feelings. We want to have happy
clients who feel like they were fairly treated and were not caught
by surprise with regard to the cost of the litigation. We would
rather not be retained by a client who would settle for nothing
less than being told only what they want to hear instead of what is the
realistic truth.
|